SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
SLP(C) No. 025622-025624 of 2017
Process Id-222/2017
UNION OF INDIA and others
Vs
ROHIT NATHAN and another
Listed on:- 09-10-2017
at Item No 45
Office Report of Fresh Cases
1. The limitation period of the appeal(s)/special leave petition(s) is as follows.
|
S.No.
|
Court
|
State
|
Bench
|
Case No.
|
Order Date
|
Petition in Time
|
Delay Days Filing
|
Delay Days Re-filing
|
|
1 |
High Court |
TAMIL NADU
|
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS |
WP-6387-2017 |
31-08-2017
|
Yes |
|
|
|
2 |
High Court |
TAMIL NADU
|
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS |
WP-6388-2017 |
31-08-2017
|
yes |
|
|
|
3 |
High Court |
TAMIL NADU
|
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS |
WP-6389-2017 |
31-08-2017
|
YES |
|
|
2. The advocate has filed Document(s)/Interlocutory Application(s) as follows:-
|
S.No.
|
Document No.
|
Name of Document
|
Filing date
|
Verification Status
|
Page No.
|
|
1 |
96642-2017 |
EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT |
21-09-2017 |
|
|
|
2 |
96823-2017 |
PROOF OF SERVICE |
21-09-2017 |
|
|
3. Similarity found in the present case is based on:
|
Diary No.
|
Case No.
|
Petitioner/Respondent
|
Status
|
|
No Information Available
|
4. It is submitted that, in terms of Order XV Rule 2, the status of proof of service upon the respondent(s)/caveator(s) is as follows:-
|
S.No.
|
Respondent(s)/Caveator(s)
|
Status of proof of service
|
Date of Service
|
|
HARSH PARASHAR
|
filed
|
21.09.2017
|
Assistant Registrar