1. The limitation period of the appeal(s)/special leave petition(s) is as follows.
S.No.
Court
State
Bench
Case No.
Order Date
Petition in Time
Delay Days Filing
Delay Days Re-filing
1
High Court
PUNJAB
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RFA-4944-2013
27-02-2017
No
955
Refiling is within time
2
High Court
PUNJAB
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RFA-4940-2013
27-02-2017
No
955
Refiling is within time
3
High Court
PUNJAB
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RFA-4942-2013
27-02-2017
No
955
Refiling is within time
4
High Court
PUNJAB
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RFA-4945-2013
27-02-2017
No
955
Refiling is within time
5
High Court
PUNJAB
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RFA-4946-2013
27-02-2017
No
955
Refiling is within time
6
High Court
PUNJAB
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RFA-4947-2013
27-02-2017
No
955
Refiling is within time
7
High Court
PUNJAB
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RFA-4948-2013
27-02-2017
No
955
Refiling is within time
8
High Court
PUNJAB
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RFA-4950-2013
27-02-2017
No
955
Refiling is within time
9
High Court
PUNJAB
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RFA-4951-2013
27-02-2017
No
955
Refiling is within time
10
High Court
PUNJAB
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RFA-4952-2013
27-02-2017
No
955
Refiling is within time
11
High Court
PUNJAB
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RFA-1033-2014
27-02-2017
No
955
Refiling is within time
12
High Court
PUNJAB
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CO-205-2015
27-02-2017
No
955
Refiling is within time
13
High Court
PUNJAB
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RFA-4838-2013
27-02-2017
No
955
Refiling is within time
2. The advocate has filed Document(s)/Interlocutory Application(s) as follows:-
S.No.
Document No.
Name of Document
Filing date
Verification Status
Page No.
1
8638-2020
CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
15-01-2020
2
8640-2020
PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..)
15-01-2020
3
8641-2020
APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION
15-01-2020
4
8642-2020
CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING SUBSTITUTION APPLN.
15-01-2020
3. Similarity found in the present case is based on:
S.No.
Diary No.
Case No.
Petitioner/Respondent
Remarks
Status
1
1993/2018
SLP(C) No. 005133 / 2018
THE UNION TERRITORY OF CHANDIGARH
vs.
SARDARA SINGH (DECEASED) THROUGH LRS AND ORS
@ common order
Pending (Annexure P-5 page no. 128-129)
4. It is submitted that, in terms of Order XV Rule 2, the status of proof of service upon the respondent(s)/caveator(s) is as follows:-
S.No.
Respondent(s)/Caveator(s)
Status of proof of service
Date of Service
No Information Available
Note:- It
is submitted that Counsel for petitioner has on 15.01.2020 filed
application for substitution of LRs of deceased Shyam Singh (Appellant no. 1 in RFA No. 4946/2013), Kaur Chand (Appellant no. 2 in RFA No. 4946/2013), Ujjagar Singh
(Appellant no. 2 in RFA No. 4947/2013 & Appellant no. 8A in RFA No. 4838/2013), Bhajan Singh (Appellant no. 8B in RFA No. 4838/2013) and Karam Chand (Appellant no. 88 in RFA No. 4838/2013).
The counsel has also filed
application for condonation of delay in filing substitution since
there is a delay of 2097, 511, 910, 1843 and 1787 days respectively in filing
substitution along
with the prayer for setting aside abatement.
The same are already included in paperbooks.