|
Listed On
|
05-04-2021
|
|
Court No.
|
7
|
|
Item No.
|
23
|
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
SLP(Crl) No. 002435 of 2021
Process Id-435/2021
B. PURUSHOTHAMAN
Vs
THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT
Office Report of Fresh Cases
1. The limitation period of the appeal(s)/special leave petition(s) is as follows.
|
S.No.
|
Court
|
State
|
Bench
|
Case No.
|
Order Date
|
Petition in Time
|
Delay Days Filing
|
Delay Days Re-filing
|
|
1 |
High Court |
TAMIL NADU
|
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS |
CRLRC-987-2020 |
27-01-2021
|
Yes |
|
Refiling is within time
|
2. The advocate has filed Document(s)/Interlocutory Application(s) as follows:-
|
S.No.
|
Document No.
|
Name of Document
|
Filing date
|
Verification Status
|
Page No.
|
|
No Information Available
|
3. Similarity found in the present case is based on:
|
S.No.
|
Diary No.
|
Case No.
|
Petitioner/Respondent
|
Remarks
|
Status
|
|---|
1
| 16563/2017 | Crl.A. No. 001269 / 2017 @ SLP(Crl) No. 004466 / 2017 |
DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT vs. M/S OBULAPURAM MINING COMPANY PVT LTD | as referred at Listing Proforma and Page "B" and "C" of List of dates
| Pending (R/P dated 24/07/2017 is enclosed)
|
4. It is submitted that, in terms of Order XV Rule 2, the status of proof of service upon the respondent(s)/caveator(s) is as follows:-
|
S.No.
|
Respondent(s)/Caveator(s)
|
Status of proof of service
|
Date of Service
|
| No Information Available |
Note:-
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR