|
Listed On
|
24-01-2023
|
|
Court No.
|
3
|
|
Item No.
|
6
|
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
C.A. No. 008645 of 2022
Process Id-62/2023
SMALL INDUSTRIES DEVELOPMENT BANK OF INDIA (SIDBI)
Vs
VIVEK RAHEJA and others
Listed on:- 24-01-2023
at Item No 6
Office Report of Fresh Cases
1. The limitation period of the appeal(s)/special leave petition(s) is as follows.
|
S.No.
|
Court
|
State
|
Bench
|
Case No.
|
Order Date
|
Petition in Time
|
Delay Days Filing
|
Delay Days Re-filing
|
|
1 |
State Agency |
DELHI
|
NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APELLATE TRIBUNAL |
CAAT(I)-570-2022 |
16-09-2022
|
Yes |
|
Refiling is within time
|
2. The advocate has filed Document(s)/Interlocutory Application(s) as follows:-
|
S.No.
|
Document No.
|
Name of Document
|
Filing date
|
Verification Status
|
Page No.
|
|
1 |
178673-2022 |
EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT |
20-11-2022 |
|
|
|
2 |
178674-2022 |
EX-PARTE AD-INTERIM RELIEF |
20-11-2022 |
|
|
|
3 |
179212-2022 |
PROOF OF SERVICE |
21-11-2022 |
|
|
3. Similarity found in the present case is based on:
|
S.No.
|
Diary No.
|
Case No.
|
Petitioner/Respondent
|
Remarks
|
Status
|
|---|
|
No Information Available
|
4. It is submitted that, in terms of Order XV Rule 2, the status of proof of service upon the respondent(s)/caveator(s) is as follows:-
|
S.No.
|
Respondent(s)/Caveator(s)
|
Status of proof of service
|
Date of Service
|
|
1 |
MITHU JAIN
R [1]
|
YES |
21-11-2022 |
Note:-
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR