|
Listed On
|
14-02-2022
|
|
Court No.
|
45
|
|
Item No.
|
31
|
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
SLP(Crl) No. 001053-001056 of 2022
Process Id-161/2022
THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE and others
Vs
MURUGANANTHAM
Office Report of Fresh Cases
1. The limitation period of the appeal(s)/special leave petition(s) is as follows.
|
S.No.
|
Court
|
State
|
Bench
|
Case No.
|
Order Date
|
Petition in Time
|
Delay Days Filing
|
Delay Days Re-filing
|
|
1 |
High Court |
TAMIL NADU
|
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS AT MADURAI |
CRLOP(MD)-3264-2022 |
21-01-2022
|
Yes |
|
Refiling is within time
|
|
2 |
High Court |
TAMIL NADU
|
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS AT MADURAI |
CRLOP(MD)-1344-2022 |
22-01-2022
|
Yes |
|
Refiling is within time
|
|
3 |
High Court |
TAMIL NADU
|
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS AT MADURAI |
CRLOP(MD)-1344-2022 |
24-01-2022
|
Yes |
|
Refiling is within time
|
|
4 |
High Court |
TAMIL NADU
|
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS AT MADURAI |
CRLOP(MD)-1344-2022 |
31-01-2022
|
Yes |
|
Refiling is within time
|
2. The advocate has filed Document(s)/Interlocutory Application(s) as follows:-
|
S.No.
|
Document No.
|
Name of Document
|
Filing date
|
Verification Status
|
Page No.
|
|
1 |
18105-2022 |
EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT |
07-02-2022 |
|
|
|
2 |
18106-2022 |
EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. |
07-02-2022 |
|
|
|
3 |
18195-2022 |
PROOF OF SERVICE |
07-02-2022 |
|
|
3. Similarity found in the present case is based on:
|
S.No.
|
Diary No.
|
Case No.
|
Petitioner/Respondent
|
Remarks
|
Status
|
|---|
|
No Information Available
|
4. It is submitted that, in terms of Order XV Rule 2, the status of proof of service upon the respondent(s)/caveator(s) is as follows:-
|
S.No.
|
Respondent(s)/Caveator(s)
|
Status of proof of service
|
Date of Service
|
|
1 |
A. LAKSHMINARAYANAN ADVOCATE ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT NO. [1]
|
YES |
07-02-2022 |
2
|
Prasanna S.
ADVOCATE ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT NO. [2]
|
YES |
07-02-2022 |
Note:-
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR