Suppl.
Listed On

05-01-2023
Court No.
Item No.

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

SLP(C) No. 000252 of 2023

Process Id-1/2023
RAMAKANT AMBALAL CHOKSI
Vs
HARISH AMBALAL CHOKSI and others
Office Report of Fresh Cases
1. The limitation period of the appeal(s)/special leave petition(s) is as follows.
S.No. Court State Bench Case No. Order Date Petition in Time Delay Days Filing Delay Days Re-filing
1 High Court GUJARAT HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD AFO-86-2022 08-12-2022 Yes
Refiling is within time
2. The advocate has filed Document(s)/Interlocutory Application(s) as follows:-
S.No. Document No. Name of Document Filing date Verification Status Page No.
1 2247-2023 EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT 04-01-2023
3. Similarity found in the present case is based on:
S.No. Diary No. Case No. Petitioner/Respondent Remarks Status
1
17494/2019 SLP(Crl) No. 005805 - 005806 / 2019
HARISH AMBALAL CHOKSHI AND ORS vs. RAMAKANT AMBALAL CHOKSHI AND ORS
@similar issue, referred at page 25 of impugned order
Dismissed on 24.02.2020 (R/P enclosed)
2
16818/2019 SLP(Crl) No. 004810 / 2019
RAMAKANT AMBALAL CHOKSHI vs. MITESH HARISHBHAI CHOKSHI AND ORS
filed by the petitioner herein
Dismissed on 10.05.2019 (R/P enclosed)
4. It is submitted that, in terms of Order XV Rule 2, the status of proof of service upon the respondent(s)/caveator(s) is as follows:-
S.No. Respondent(s)/Caveator(s) Status of proof of service Date of Service
No Information Available
Note:- It is submitted that Registry has raised an objection regarding Defect no. 1 (some pages of annexure p-2 i.e. (page no. 109-110 ) are in small font) and as per impugned order there is only one petitioner and one respondent while in SLP there are more parties), Counsel for Petitioner has filed a clarification letter dated 04.01.2023 .Copies of the letter are already placed in the paper book (page no.329).

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR