Listed On 18-09-2023
Court No. 17
Item No. 19

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Diary No. 26044-2023

Process Id-984/2023
HDFC BANK LTD.
Vs
JAGDISH LAL SHARMA
Office Report of Fresh Cases
1. The limitation period of the appeal(s)/special leave petition(s) is as follows.
S.No. Court State Bench Case No. Order Date Petition in Time Delay Days Filing Delay Days Re-filing
1 High Court DELHI HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA-59-2021 28-03-2023 Yes
41 days
2 High Court DELHI HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA-196-2021 28-03-2023 Yes
41 days
2. The advocate has filed Document(s)/Interlocutory Application(s) as follows:-
S.No. Document No. Name of Document Filing date Verification Status Page No.
1 187154-2023 CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS 13-09-2023
3. Similarity found in the present case is based on:
S.No. Diary No. Case No. Petitioner/Respondent Remarks Status
1
24647/2013C.A. No. 007262 - 007263 / 2013@
SLP(C) No. 025744 - 025745 / 2013
PUMA SPORTS INDIA PVT. LTD. vs. RAGHUBIR SARAN CHARITABLE TRUST
refer to Annexure P-16
Pending (Annexure P-16 at page no. 290)
2
2905/2016SLP(C) No. 005479 / 2016@
S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 003657 / 2016
HDFC BANK LTD. vs. M/S. MEATTLES PVT LTD.
refer to Annexure P-16Pending (Annexure P-16 at page no. 291)
3
1549/2016 SLP(C) No. 003342 - 003343 / 2016
SATYA DEVELOPERS PVT LTD. vs. PEAREY LAL BHAWAN ASSOCIATION
refer to Annexure P-16Pending (Annexure P-16 at page no. 292)
4. It is submitted that, in terms of Order XV Rule 2, the status of proof of service upon the respondent(s)/caveator(s) is as follows:-
S.No. Respondent(s)/Caveator(s) Status of proof of service Date of Service
No Information Available
Note:-


ASSISTANT REGISTRAR