Listed On 06-10-2023
Court No. 6
Item No. 8

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

W.P.(Crl.) No. 000446 of 2023

Process Id-1146/2023
ROHIT CHATURVEDI
Vs
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND and others
Office Report of Fresh Cases
1. The limitation period of the appeal(s)/special leave petition(s) is as follows.
S.No. Court State Bench Case No. Order Date Petition in Time Delay Days Filing Delay Days Re-filing
No Information Available
2. The advocate has filed Document(s)/Interlocutory Application(s) as follows:-
S.No. Document No. Name of Document Filing date Verification Status Page No.
1 196542-2023 EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. 23-09-2023
2 196543-2023 INTERIM BAIL 23-09-2023
3. Similarity found in the present case is based on:
S.No. Diary No. Case No. Petitioner/Respondent Remarks Status
1
35671/2022W.P.(Crl.) No. 000445 / 2022
AMARMANI TRIPATHI vs. THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ORS
Filed by the co-accused
@ same FIR/Crime No.
Refer at Listing Proforma
Disposed of on 10.02.2023
(Copy of order enclosed)
2
28836/2022 W.P.(Crl.) No. 000373 / 2022
MADHUMANI TRIPATHI vs. THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ORS
@ same FIR/Crime No.Disposed of on 21.11.2022
(Copy of order enclosed)
3
21143/2013SLP(Crl) No. 007507 / 2013
SLP(Crl.)...CRLMP No. 016745 / 2013 
ROHIT CHATURVEDI vs. STATE (THROUGH CBI)
Annexure P-2
Dismissed on 19.11.2023
(Annexure P-2, Page no. 43)
4. It is submitted that, in terms of Order XV Rule 2, the status of proof of service upon the respondent(s)/caveator(s) is as follows:-
S.No. Respondent(s)/Caveator(s) Status of proof of service Date of Service
No Information Available

Note:-It is submitted that the registry has raisd objection regarding defect no.3 i.e copy of order ST 411/05 Required. The counsel for the petitioner has filed a clarification letter. Copy of the same is already placed at page no. 121 of the paper books.

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR