Listed On
|
11-03-2024
|
Court No.
|
9
|
Item No.
|
25
|
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Diary No. 10447-2024
Process Id-616/2024
SARANGA ANILKUMAR AGGARWAL
Vs
BHAVESH DHIRAJLAL SHETH and others
Office Report of Fresh Cases
1. The limitation period of the appeal(s)/special leave petition(s) is as follows.
S.No.
|
Court
|
State
|
Bench
|
Case No.
|
Order Date
|
Petition in Time
|
Delay Days Filing
|
Delay Days Re-filing
|
1 |
State Agency |
DELHI
|
NATIONAL CONSUMERS DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI |
EA-140-2019 |
07-02-2024
|
Yes |
|
Refiling is within time
|
2. The advocate has filed Document(s)/Interlocutory Application(s) as follows:-
S.No.
|
Document No.
|
Name of Document
|
Filing date
|
Verification Status
|
Page No.
|
1 |
58759-2024 |
PERMISSION TO FILE APPEAL |
05-03-2024 |
|
|
2 |
58760-2024 |
STAY APPLICATION |
05-03-2024 |
|
|
3 |
58761-2024 |
EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT |
05-03-2024 |
|
|
4 |
61169-2024 |
LETTER |
07-03-2024 |
|
|
3. Similarity found in the present case is based on:
S.No.
|
Diary No.
|
Case No.
|
Petitioner/Respondent
|
Remarks
|
Status
|
---|
1
| 12787/2023 |
SLP(Crl) No. 004727 / 2023
| NATIONAL SPOT EXCHANGE LIMITED vs. SHEETAL GUPTA AND ANR | refer at page 5 of impugned order
| Dismissed on 28.04.2023 (r/p enclosed)
|
2
|
38055/2023 | C.A. No. 006665 - 006666 / 2023 | SARANGA ANILKUMAR AGGARWAL vs. DILIP OOMMEN AND ANR. ETC. | @ similar issue filed by the petitioner herein
| Pending (r/p dated 13.02.2024 enclosed)
|
4. It is submitted that, in terms of Order XV Rule 2, the status of proof of service upon the respondent(s)/caveator(s) is as follows:-
S.No.
|
Respondent(s)/Caveator(s)
|
Status of proof of service
|
Date of Service
|
No Information Available |
Note:-
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR