Listed On 11-03-2024
Court No.   9
Item No.   25

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Diary No. 10447-2024

Process Id-616/2024
SARANGA ANILKUMAR AGGARWAL
Vs
BHAVESH DHIRAJLAL SHETH and others
Office Report of Fresh Cases
1. The limitation period of the appeal(s)/special leave petition(s) is as follows.
S.No. Court State Bench Case No. Order Date Petition in Time Delay Days Filing Delay Days Re-filing
1 State Agency DELHI NATIONAL CONSUMERS DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI EA-140-2019 07-02-2024 Yes
Refiling is within time
2. The advocate has filed Document(s)/Interlocutory Application(s) as follows:-
S.No. Document No. Name of Document Filing date Verification Status Page No.
1 58759-2024 PERMISSION TO FILE APPEAL 05-03-2024
2 58760-2024 STAY APPLICATION 05-03-2024
3 58761-2024 EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT 05-03-2024
4 61169-2024 LETTER 07-03-2024
3. Similarity found in the present case is based on:
S.No. Diary No. Case No. Petitioner/Respondent Remarks Status
1
12787/2023 SLP(Crl) No. 004727 / 2023
NATIONAL SPOT EXCHANGE LIMITED vs. SHEETAL GUPTA AND ANR
refer at page 5 of impugned order
Dismissed on 28.04.2023 (r/p enclosed)
2
38055/2023C.A. No. 006665 - 006666 / 2023
SARANGA ANILKUMAR AGGARWAL vs. DILIP OOMMEN AND ANR. ETC.
@ similar issue filed by the petitioner herein
Pending (r/p dated 13.02.2024 enclosed)
4. It is submitted that, in terms of Order XV Rule 2, the status of proof of service upon the respondent(s)/caveator(s) is as follows:-
S.No. Respondent(s)/Caveator(s) Status of proof of service Date of Service
No Information Available
Note:-


ASSISTANT REGISTRAR