1. The limitation period of the appeal(s)/special leave petition(s) is as follows.
S.No.
Court
State
Bench
Case No.
Order Date
Petition in Time
Delay Days Filing
Delay Days Re-filing
1
High Court
MAHARASHTRA
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
FCA(ST)-12364-2022
05-01-2024
Yes
Refiling is within time
2. The advocate has filed Document(s)/Interlocutory Application(s) as follows:-
S.No.
Document No.
Name of Document
Filing date
Verification Status
Page No.
1
22650-2024
PERMISSION TO APPEAR AND ARGUE IN PERSON
29-01-2024
2
22651-2024
EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT
29-01-2024
3
24228-2024
EX-PARTE AD-INTERIM RELIEF
30-01-2024
3. Similarity found in the present case is based on:
S.No.
Diary No.
Case No.
Petitioner/Respondent
Remarks
Status
Diary No.- 33602 - 2023
SLP(C) No. 018723 - 018724 / 2023
SHEETAL DEVANG SHAH vs. DEVANG MAHENDRA SHAH
Filed between same parties challenging order dated 26.06.2023 in same case
Dismissed on 25.09.2023 Annex. P3 Page no. 15-16
Diary No.- 16511 - 2022
C.A. No. 008082 / 2023 @ SC 9962/2022
SHEETAL DEVANG SHAH vs. NALINI MAHENDRA SHAH AND ANR
Marked as Annex. P4 and Annex. P5
Disposed of on 11.12.2023 Annex. P5 Page no. 19-23
Diary No.- 51481 - 2023
SLP(Crl) No. 016227 / 2023
SHEETAL DEVANG SHAH vs. NALINI MAHENDRA SHAH
Marked as Annex. P6
Dismissed on 08.01.2024 R/P enclosed
4. It is submitted that, in terms of Order XV Rule 2, the status of proof of service upon the respondent(s)/caveator(s) is as follows:-
S.No.
Respondent(s)/Caveator(s)
Status of proof of service
Date of Service
No Information Available
5. The report of Registrar in relation to interaction under Order IV Rule 1(C) provisio of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013, is enclosed herewith for kind perusal of the Hon. Court. It is submitted that petitioner-in-person has filed an application for ex-parte ad-interim relief and the same are being circulated for kind perusal of the Hon. Court.