Process Id-1989/2024

THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1 NIZAMABAD and another

THE PRIMARY AGRI CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED

Office Report of Fresh Cases

1. The limitation period of the appeal(s)/special leave petition(s) is as follows.

S.No.	Court	State	Bench	Case No.	Order Date	Petition in Time	Delay Days Filing	Delay Days Re-filing
1	High Court	TELANGANA	HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD	WP(C)-33954-2023	16-12-2023	No	136

2. The advocate has filed Document(s)/Interlocutory Application(s) as follows:-

S.No.	Document No.	Name of Document	Filing date	Verification Status	Page No.
1	194225-2024	EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT	30-08-2024
2	194226-2024	CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING	30-08-2024

3. Similarity found in the present case is based on:

S.No.	Diary No.	Case No.	Petitioner/Respondent	Remarks	Status
1	25379/2024		THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD -1 AND ORS vs. BUSIREDDY NARSIMHA REDDY	@common relied upon order	Pending (R/P dated 30.08.2024 enclosed)
2	9338/2024	SLP(C) No. 008995 / 2024	THE INCOME TAX OFFICER AND ORS vs. HARI MOHAN REDDY VANGA	impugned order of which has been relied in instant matter	Pending (R/P dated 18.03.2024 enclosed)
3	19701/2024	SLP(C) No. 017087 / 2024	THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 1 NIZAMABAD AND ORS vs. NARAHARI ANGAREKULA	@common relied upon order	Pending (R/P dated 08.07.2024 enclosed)
4	2435/2024	SLP(C) No. 003011 / 2024	DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 8 (2) (1) MUMBAI AND ORS vs. M/S SIEMENS FINANCIAL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED	referred at listing proforma	Judgment reserved on 08.08.2024 enclosed (R/P enclosed)

4. It is submitted that, in terms of Order XV Rule 2, the status of proof of service upon the respondent(s)/caveator(s) is as follows:-

S.No.	Respondent(s)/Caveator(s)	Status of proof of service	Date of Service
No Information Available

5. Amount involved in tax matters is as follows:-

S.No.	Amount Involved
1	Writ matter (N.A.)

Note:-

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR