|
Listed On
|
06-12-2024
|
|
Court No.
|
5
|
|
Item No.
|
23
|
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
C.A. No. 012224-012225 of 2024
Process Id-2683/2024
RAJIV DHAMIJA and another
Vs
KULDEEP VERMA and another
Office Report of Fresh Cases
1. The limitation period of the appeal(s)/special leave petition(s) is as follows.
|
S.No.
|
Court
|
State
|
Bench
|
Case No.
|
Order Date
|
Petition in Time
|
Delay Days Filing
|
Delay Days Re-filing
|
|
1 |
State Agency |
DELHI
|
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal |
CAAT(I)-702-2024 |
30-08-2024
|
Yes |
-
|
Refiling is within time
|
|
2 |
State Agency |
DELHI
|
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal |
CAAT(I)-703-2024 |
30-08-2024
|
Yes |
-
|
Refiling is within time
|
2. The advocate has filed Document(s)/Interlocutory Application(s) as follows:-
|
S.No.
|
Document No.
|
Name of Document
|
Filing date
|
Verification Status
|
Page No.
|
|
1 |
253860-2024 |
GRANT OF INTERIM RELIEF |
06-11-2024 |
|
|
|
2 |
267888-2024 |
PROOF OF SERVICE |
20-11-2024 |
|
|
|
3 |
273651-2024 |
PROOF OF SERVICE |
26-11-2024 |
|
|
3. Similarity found in the present case is based on:
|
S.No.
|
Diary No.
|
Case No.
|
Petitioner/Respondent
|
Remarks
|
Status
|
|---|
1.
| 35263/2022 | C.A. No. 000826 / 2023 | RAJIV DHAMIJA AND ANR vs. KULDEEP VERMA AND ORS | filed by the same petitioners challenging the order of NCLAT dismissing the appeal challenging the order of liquidator
| Dismissed on 03.02.2023 (copy of order enclosed).
|
4. It is submitted that, in terms of Order XV Rule 2, the status of proof of service upon the respondent(s)/caveator(s) is as follows:-
|
S.No.
|
Respondent(s)/Caveator(s)
|
Status of proof of service
|
Date of Service
|
|
1 |
NIRNIMESH DUBE, Advocate on behalf of Respondent No. 2
|
YES |
20-11-2024 |
| |
|
|
2 |
ABHAY ANAND JENA, Advocate on behalf of Respondent No. 1
|
YES |
26-11-2024 |
| |
|
Note:-
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR