1. The limitation period of the appeal(s)/special leave petition(s) is as follows.
S.No.
Court
State
Bench
Case No.
Order Date
Petition in Time
Delay Days Filing
Delay Days Re-filing
1
High Court
KERALA
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WA-1941-2023
30-01-2024
Yes
2
High Court
KERALA
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WA-1945-2023
30-01-2024
Yes
2. The advocate has filed Document(s)/Interlocutory Application(s) as follows:-
S.No.
Document No.
Name of Document
Filing date
Verification Status
Page No.
1
46152-2024
PROOF OF SERVICE
21-02-2024
2
46295-2024
ADDITION / DELETION / MODIFICATION PARTIES
21-02-2024
3. Similarity found in the present case is based on:
S.No.
Diary No.
Case No.
Petitioner/Respondent
Remarks
Status
1
6067/2024
SLP(C) No. 005077 - 005078 / 2024
ANOOP M AND ORS vs. GIREESHKUMAR T.M AND ORS
@Same judgment
Pending (R/P dated 23.02.2024 enclosed) and as per ICMIS listed on 01.03.2024, Court no.16 item no.60
4. It is submitted that, in terms of Order XV Rule 2, the status of proof of service upon the respondent(s)/caveator(s) is as follows:-
S.No.
Respondent(s)/Caveator(s)
Status of proof of service
Date of Service
1
ABDULLA NASEEH V.T.
ADVOCATE ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT NO. [1] IN WA-1941/2023
YES
21-02-2024
2
MOHAMMED SADIQUE T.A.
ADVOCATE ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT [1] IN WA-1945/23, BOTH CAVEAT PLACED IN D NO. 6067/24
YES
21-02-2024
Note:-
It is submitted that
Counsel for Petitioner has filed application for
deletion to delete the Proforma Respondent Nos. 11 to 39 in SLP against W.A. No.1941/2023 and also 20 to 71 in SLP against W.A. No.1945/2023 from array of parties.Same is already
placed in paper book.