Listed On: 03-03-2025
Court No.: 2
Item No.: 18

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 000161-000161/2025

Process Id: 355/2025

SOFTWARE FREEDOM LAW CENTER, INDIA and another ... Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA and another ... Respondent(s)
OFFICE REPORT OF FRESH CASE
1. This Writ Petition has been filed by Mr. PARAS NATH SINGH Advocate on-Record/petitioner in-person, on 19-02-2025, praying therein as under:

"A. Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction or declaration quashing and setting aside Rule 16 of the Information Technology (Procedure and Safeguards for Blocking for Access of Information by Public) Rules, 2009; AND."

B.Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction or declaration, declaring Rule 8 of the Information Technology (Procedure and Safeguards for Blocking for Access of Information by Public) Rules, 2009 null and void or in the alternative to read the word or to mean œand in Rule 8 and ensure that the notice for blocking be issued to the intermediary as well as the person (originator or creator of the content); AND

C.Issue an appropriate writ, order, or direction or declaration striking down and/or reading down Rule 9 of the Blocking Rules, 2009, to mandate the issuance of a notice, opportunity of hearing, and communication of a copy of the interim order to the person (originator or creator of the content) prior to the passing of a final order; AND

D.Issue an appropriate writ, order, or direction mandating the Respondents to prescribe a notice format in the Information Technology (Procedure and Safeguards for Blocking for Access of Information by Public) Rules, 2009, which discloses all relevant details to enable the noticee to effectively respond to the notice;

E.Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the Respondents to disclose the number of instances where the power to block information has been utilised under Rule 8 without notice to the originator and/or the intermediary;

F. Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the Respondents to disclose the number of instances where the power to block information has been utilised under Rule 9 without notice to the originator and/or the intermediary;

G. Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the Respondents to disclose the minutes/findings of the Review Committee as referable to Rule 14 of the Information Technology (Procedure and Safeguards for Blocking for Access of Information by Public) Rules, 2009, in assurance with the fundamental rights enshrined under the Constitution of India.

H. Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction calling for the records from the Respondents relating to the proceedings referable to Section 15 of the Information Technology (Procedure and Safeguards for Blocking for Access of Information by Public) Rules, 2009 in order to enable the aggrieved person to take necessary as deemed fit in accordance with law"


2. The Advocate on-record for the petitioner/appellant has also filed following document(s)/ Interlocutory application(s):
S.No. Application No. Description of Document Filing date Verification Status Page No.
No Information Available

3. The similarity found in the present case is based on:
S.No. Diary No. Case No. Cause Title Status Remarks
1
28817/2019 W.P.(C) No. 001031 / 2019 
ANURADHA BHASIN vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
Disposed of on 10.01.2020
Citation
[2020] 1 S.C.R. 812
2020 INSC 31
referred to listing proforma
2
39068/2012 W.P.(Crl.) No. 000167 / 2012
SHREYA SINGHAL vs. U.O.I. AND ANR
Disposed of on 24.03.2015
Citation
[2015] 5 S.C.R. 963
2015 INSC 257
referred to listing proforma
4. The writ petition along with the application(s) above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office Report.
DATE: 27-02-2025

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

Copy to :-

1
Mr. Paras Nath Singh , Advocate